Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/122
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFalkheimer, Jesper-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-10T13:34:20Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-10T13:34:20Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/122-
dc.description.abstractIn the article, the main theories of Anthony Giddens (structuration and late modernity theory) are presented and applied upon public relations. A review shows that there have been few attempts to use these theories in public relations. The analysis states that using Giddens leads to a questioning of the dichotomy between instrumental agency-oriented theories that neglects power structures as well as critical theories that only views public relations as hidden strategic action used by elites to dominate the public sphere. The conclusion is that there are two major arguments for applying Giddens to public relations: (1) the theory of late modernity may enhance our understanding of public relations as an evolving practice in socio-historical and spatial terms; (2) the structuration theory enhances the holistic understanding of how public relations communication, interpreted as a process, may be used both as a reproductive and a transforming social instrument. Giddens theory may in other words be used as a “third way public relations theory”.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLund Universityen_US
dc.subjectAnthonyen_US
dc.subjectGiddensen_US
dc.subjectSociologyen_US
dc.subjectPublic relationsen_US
dc.subjectRelationsen_US
dc.titleAnthony Giddens and public relationsen_US
dc.title.alternativeA third way perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:eCollection

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Anthony Giddens and public relations.pdf168.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.